Thanks, Dr. Bryce Swanson, DO, for recommending Rapid Slim SX to me on TV! I know you’re only a “Resident Physician,” but you said you read the
study about Rapid Slim SX and it’s going to work, right?
You’re in your last year of Anesthesia Residency
, so you’re clearly an authority on weight loss. Which is why it surprised me that in your
“Talk With Dr. Bryce Swanson”
you glaze right over the health benefits of weight loss.
As an anesthesiologist, I would’ve thought you would’ve spoken most about how obese patients are more challenging to manage in the operating room, due to
their decreased chest wall compliance and
decreased functional residual capacity
or talk about any of the other health benefits of weight loss (decreasing insulin resistance, decreases in cancer risks, etc). But instead, when you’re asked
“In your opinion, what are the benefits to losing weight?” you say “I think that losing weight helps a woman feel better inside and out. She’s
more confident, she’s more energetic, she regains that spring in her step because she likes the way she looks,” and mention that “also” there
are health benefits. I’m also scratching my head, Dr. Swanson, because you say that “A major diet overhaul must be gradual so it can be sustained over
time,” but then you go on to say that “I would recommend RapidSlim SX because it delivers amazing weight-loss results
so quickly
and because available published research reveals it to be a superior formula and brand.” [my emphasis] (Also, superior to what? And what’s the
“available published research?” I can’t seem to find it, even though you flaunt the study all over the damn website.)
I’ve also been quite impressed with
Chief Scientific Officer Marvin Heuer, MD’s work history
. (Thanks, Angry Doctor!) I also love
his resume
, with most of his publications being listed as “Submitted for Publication.” I should fatten my resume that way. I’ve got TONS of things I could
submit for publication!
Hey, if it really works, and you really believe in it, Dr. Swanson, that’s great. But a little more intellectual honesty might get you a lot further. (But I
guess that doesn’t really sell pills, does it?)
As I am counting down the days until I can get
Step 2
over with (T-minus 10!), I’m going insane memorizing diseases I will never see in my lifetime. I need some laughs. So I’m asking everyone to please post
their favorite medical joke. (And plus, it’d be a great chance to see people’s faces and comedic timing.) Oh, fine, if you’re anonymous, I guess you
just can post the text, but come on, video is sooo 2008. (If you use YouTube, tag your video as “
medicaljoke
” so they’ll be easier to find.)
Either comment or
email me
the Youtube link or your blog posting, and I’ll start a running list here on this blog post. And if you don’t have a blog, just leave a comment! Please!
I’m begging you! Help a guy escape from the hells of Boards reviewing. I’ll start:
I think Organic Chemistry serves a purpose, but it’s not because Orgo is useful to a clinician. It’s to see if a person has the dedication and ability to
memorize an insane amount of very abstract material in a very short span of time, and then be able to apply said material to a specific problem. (Which you have to do
in med school.) This also does a good job of weeding out people.
I’d love to see a mandatory second language of one’s choosing in there too (which most of my classmates probably already meet anyway). Similar to the
organic chemistry metaphor, medicine is learning a language. (And it also comes in handy with patients. Just two days ago I was doing a second look at a program and
helping an intern with a lumbar puncture, and my seemingly-useless French allowed me to communicate with our patient.)
Sorry for the dearth of posting lately; I’ve been busily hitting city after city on the interview trail–and the residencies, unfortunately, continue to be
great (making my ranking decision next to impossible).
And thank you to Chicago, where I’ve been interviewing as of late. After 11 years driving without a single parking ticket, thank you, Chicago, for welcoming
your forgotten son (I went to undergrad in the area) back with open arms. Two tickets and my car towed today for a tow away zone sign that was crumpled and gnarled
away. I missed you too.
And finally,
Joe Paduda on HSAs, the rebuttal version
. “One noted that they make “health care more affordable for the majority of consumers”; I think the commenter is conflating health insurance with
health care. HSA plans may make insurance more affordable, but health care costs are not any cheaper under HSA plans. In fact, HSA plans’ higher out-of-pocket
costs may make health care costs less affordable.”
I’m going to start with
Health Beat Blog’s great summary of the US’s terrible ranking with preventable deaths
. Great summary of the data, and the implications.
Shadowfax agrees.
In the comments, The Happy Hospitalist says no country is really doing all that great with preventable deaths, which I agree with, but as Shadowfax reminds us,
“We pay $7000 per capita. Again, we pay the most, and get the least.” (France, the leader, pays less than half of that.
Catron takes issue
(“load of BS”) with
my highlighting a recent poll
showing support for single-payer over our current system, saying that the poll isn’t scientific and flawed. Well of course it is, Mr. Catron–all polls
are. They also leave out all us young adults who
have
no home phone number and have unlisted cell phone numbers, too. Either never
cite pollsor surveys
yourself, or be honest. All polls suffer from selection and other biases. (Still, having half of respondents say they support a system where “all Americans
would get their insurance from a single government plan” is pretty damn impressive to me. I never would have expected the number to be that high.)
Lower co-pays make patients less likely to skip meds.
Not a surprise. When it’s food versus medication (especially anti-hypertensives which often have side effects patients don’t like), not a surprise they
pick food for themselves or their kids.
Many companies are already paying for disease management programs to help patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. So why not encourage people to take
the medicines they need. You “pay a nurse $65 an hour to call call a diabetic [employee] and say, ‘Take a beta blocker.’ And the employee says ‘I know it’s
important, why did you raise my copay from $15 to $30,” Fendrick says. “It’s a classic example of the misalignment of incentives in the U.S. health care
system.”
Out of state licensing rules
are a mess, according to California Medicine Man. Would definitely frustrate any physician trying to help.